|Is a vegetarian or vegan diet right for kids?||07/28/21|
|Red meat: yeah, we knew that||07/21/21|
|A dietary approach to reducing migraine||07/14/21|
|A healthier diet reduces the risk of pregnancy complications||07/07/21|
|More evidence against intermittent fasting||06/30/21|
|Body fat may matter more than Body Mass Index (BMI)||06/16/21|
|How to reduce your risk of dementia and Alzheimer's||06/09/21|
|On sitting less and moving more||06/02/21|
|Does intermittent fasting improve weight loss?||05/19/21|
|Choose the right snacks||05/12/21|
|Non-celiac gluten sensitivity: the controversy continues||05/05/21|
|All Health and Nutrition Bites|
At our 2021 Health meets Food: the Culinary Medicine Conference, we're offering a session on health coaching as well as one on Diabetes Prevention. Find out more »
Exercise more effective than medication in preventing diabetes
In 1996 a team of researchers with funding from multiple US governmental research centers designed a study known as the Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group to compare the impact of an intensive lifestyle change regimen, medication, or placebo on the risk of developing diabetes.
Keeping the weight off requires less exercise than you might think
Just last week I reported on a study that seems to indicate that additional exercise is more effective than medication in preventing diabetes in those who are overweight or obese.
Underscoring the importance of moderate exercise
Current recommendations are for adults to engage in at least 150 minutes of "moderate-to-vigorous physical activity" each week for reasons including improved cardiovascular outcomes.
The step-by-step guide to a Mediterranean Diet
Dr. Tim Harlan's best tips and recipes in a six-week plan for you to learn how to follow a Mediterranean-style diet while still eating foods you know and love. Just $15.00 +s/h!
Get the latest health and diet news - along with what you can do about it - sent to your Inbox once a week. Get Dr. Gourmet's Health and Nutrition Bites sent to you via email. Sign up now!
It's one thing to lose a significant amount of weight (meaning 5% or more of starting body weight). Research shows that nearly any diet, fad or evidence-based, will result in fairly rapid weight loss if people stick to the plan. This is why keto/Atkins, intermittent fasting, and other fad diets are so popular.
The problem, from a long-term health standpoint, is keeping the weight off.
The good news is that while there's quite a bit of research interest in helping people lose weight, there's just as much interest in understanding the lifestyle strategies of those who do lose weight and manage to keep it off for at least a year.
In a recent article in Obesity ( https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.23148), researchers at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo received funding from Weight Watchers to survey the habits of over 4,900 people who were of clinically normal weight and had lost at least 20 pounds (using Weight Watchers) and kept it off for at least one year.
As a control group, the authors recruited 650 adult men and women via online and in-person channels including Facebook, ResearchMatch, and the Cal Poly Center for Health Research. All reported having a Body Mass Index of at least 30 (clinically obese) and having maintained that weight for at least one year.
The authors were primarily interested in how much time the participants spent sitting, with an additional interest in what they were doing while sitting (playing video games vs. working or study, for example) as well as the amount of time they spent exercising - such as walking/running or more strenuous physical activity. What and how much they ate was of secondary importance.
All of the participants responded to two different surveys. The first is known as the Multicontext Sitting Time Questionnaire (MSTQ), which measures "time spent sitting during weekdays and weekends and doing activities such as working/reading/studying, watching TV/movies, playing video games, computer time, sleeping, and inactive transportation."
The second survey assesses the participant's home environment, focusing on what the survey terms "sedentary-promoting items in the home," from video game consoles to televisions/VCRs/DVD players/digital TV recorders to desktop and laptop computers as well as cell phones.
The authors theorized that those who maintained their weight loss for more than one year would 1. Spend less time sitting than those who were obese (the control group); 2. Expend more calories through physical activity than those in the control group, and 3. Would have fewer "sedentary-promoting items in the home" than the control group.
To the authors' surprise, there was no significant difference in the number of "sedentary-promoting items in the home" between the weight loss maintainers and the control group: for example, they had largely the same number of TV sets in the home or bedroom.
What was a significant difference between the two groups was that the weight loss maintainers spent about 1 hour less per day in non-work-related sitting "while using a computer or playing a video game".
Further, the maintainers consumed about 300 fewer calories per day, on average, than those in the control group and burned over twice as many calories through physical activity each week than the control group.
It's no surprise that those who had maintained a significant weight loss were consuming fewer calories than those who were clinically obese, but you might expect a much larger difference between the two than just about 300 calories per day.
The key here seems to be the much greater level of physical activity the weight loss maintainers participated in, with the lower amount of time spent sitting simply an indicator of more activity. Further evidence for the importance of physical activity.
First posted: June 2, 2021