|Another myth busted: protein for building muscle||07/22/20|
|More evidence that fried foods are bad for your heart||07/15/20|
|Sit less, live longer||07/08/20|
|Conventional wisdom may be right about acne||07/01/20|
|Should you salt your pasta water?||06/24/20|
|Should you go vegetarian or vegan for your heart?||06/17/20|
|Three ways drinking soda is bad for your heart||06/10/20|
|Should you stop drinking coffee as you get older?||06/03/20|
|More evidence that fruits and vegetables are good for your heart||05/20/20|
|Tomato juice may improve blood pressures||05/13/20|
|Putting paid to the coconut oil myth once and for all||05/06/20|
|Milk and ovarian cancer||04/29/20|
|Put the egg myth to rest||04/15/20|
|Protect your eyes with legumes||04/08/20|
|Good for you: less exercise than you might think||04/01/20|
|All Health and Nutrition Bites|
Corn oil better for cholesterol than coconut oil
Recently coconut oil has been touted as the new "miracle food," with its proponents claiming that it improves cholesterol scores, induces weight loss, prevents Alzheimer's, and even treats asthma. Unfortunately, many of the studies used to support these claims were performed on rats, mice, or rabbits - not humans.
Not So Magic Rice
I was at a medical conference recently and a speaker began talking about "magic rice" as if it were the greatest new food in the world. She went on to explain about research showing that cooking rice with a tablespoon of coconut oil, cooling and refrigerating overnight made it "safe for diabetics."
Fats and Their Effects on Cholesterol
Last Friday I wrote on how even a single meal that is high in saturated fat can contribute to adverse changes in the arteries of the kind that lead to heart disease. I had the question, however, from a reader to outline all the different types of fats and their effects on cholesterol. Here's a handy table to help guide you.
The step-by-step guide to a Mediterranean Diet
Dr. Tim Harlan's best tips and recipes in a six-week plan for you to learn how to follow a Mediterranean-style diet while still eating foods you know and love. Just $15.00 +s/h!
Get the latest health and diet news - along with what you can do about it - sent to your Inbox once a week. Get Dr. Gourmet's Health and Nutrition Bites sent to you via email. Sign up now!
In my persona as 'Dr. Gourmet' I spend a lot of time trying to educate people about nutrition misinformation. This is why, when I report on published research, I am careful to report on high-quality research performed in humans. Not research performed on mice - and certainly not in vitro studies (those performed on cells in test tubes).
Yes, I report on prospective studies, which are those studies that decide what outcomes they will track before the study begins. These are useful because the participants are followed for a comparatively long time period, with relevant biological measurements at the start and (at least at) the end of the study.
Yet the highest quality research remains randomized controlled trials.
In a recent review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (Circulation 2020;141:803-814), an international team of researchers identified 16 randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of the intake of coconut oil with other common vegetable-based oils, such as soybean oil, olive oil, or safflower oil.
From their analysis, the authors excluded studies that were *not* randomized controlled trials; those that included infants, animals, mice, or cell studies [that is, in vitro studies]; were literature reviews, cross-sectional, or prospective studies; were shorter than 2 weeks in length; compared coconut oil with "inappropriate" interventions, such as comparing coconut oil with fresh coconut, coconut milk, oils from mixed sources, oils that were nothing but lauric acids (one of the well-regarded sources of fats in coconut oils), or fish oils; or compared coconut oil to oils to artificial oils. Further, the included studies had to last at least 2 weeks and focus on the oils' effects on cholesterol scores; weight; body fat; waist circumference; glucose scores; or other clinical scores.
The authors of this study identified just 17 published randomized controlled trials that met the criteria. These included 730 participants.
Seven of the studies were performed in the United States, 2 in Europe, 6 in Asia, and 2 in Brazil, and most participants had normal cholesterol scores at the start of their studies. 10 of the trials provided either foods or entire meals for the participants' consumption while 5 provided cooking oils for the participants to use at home and 2 provided coconut oil in a capsule for daily consumption.
The authors obtained the data from each included study and pooled the results after standardizing the data gathered. They found that compared to non-tropical vegetable oils (that is, oils that were not coconut oil or palm oil), those who consumed the coconut oil saw an 8.6% increase in their LDL cholesterol (the bad cholesterol), a 7.8% increase in their HDL cholesterol (the good cholesterol), with no significant change in triglycerides but a statistically significant increase in total cholesterol.
Compared with palm oil (note that this is not 'palm kernel oil'), coconut oil increased total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol, but again, not triglycerides.
When the authors focused on whether coconut oil consumption affected body weight, waist circumference, body fat percentage, or glucose scores, the authors note only that the number of studies were too small for "a meaningful meta-analysis."
In brief, "Our results on the adverse effects of coconut oil as compared with alternative cooking oils on LDL-choolesterol concentrations... align with dietary recommendations to replace saturated fat with polyunsaturated fat." Further, "there was no convincing evidence to support the consumption of coconut oil over nontropical vegetable oils for [cardiovascular] risk reduction."
The proponents of coconut oil have argued that the fats in coconut oil are made of medium-chain fatty acids (MCFAs), which are more rapidly absorbed than long-chain fatty acids (the more usual saturated fatty acids) and are therefore less harmful than most saturated fats.
The problem is that about half of the total fatty acids in coconut oil are lauric acids, which although chemically are considered MCFAs, are treated by the body more like long-chain fatty acids. In addition, another 25% of the fat in the fat in coconut oil is more standard long-chain fatty acids.
While more randomized controlled trials into coconut oil's effects on body weight, waist circumference, body fat, etc., might be worthwhile, I think it's clear that unless quite convincing evidence is presented, coconut oil should be treated as the mostly saturated fat it is: one to mostly avoid in favor of oils higher in poly- and mono-unsaturated fats.
First posted: May 6, 2020