|The BMI/Breast Cancer Paradox||6/27/18|
|Gestational Diabetes Linked to Sugar-Sweetened Sodas||06/20/18|
|Got IBD? A low-FODMAP diet may be for you||06/13/18|
|Fresh vs. frozen vegetables: which is more nutritious?||06/06/18|
|Can we reverse the effects of 'supersizing'?||05/30/18|
|Take-out vs. made-from-scratch: weighing and pricing the options||05/23/18|
|How NOT to do science: very low carbohydrate diets and Type 1 diabetes||05/16/18|
|Low energy density foods keep you satisfied (and may help you lose weight)||05/09/18|
|Fish also good for diabetics: confirming conventional wisdom||05/02/18|
|All Health and Nutrition Bites|
Belly fat and sodas
Belly fat fixes seem to be ubiquitous: "Flatten your stomach with this one weird trick!" "Lose 10 pounds of belly fat by doing this!" The problem is that there's belly fat... and then there's belly fat. What most people don't realize is that there are two types of belly fat - and one is far worse for you than the other.
How to Lose Belly Fat
With the paperback version of my book coming out July 12 of 2012 (Just Tell Me What to Eat! The Delicious Six-Week Weight Loss Plan for the Real World), I've been reflecting on the myriad diets out there. There are lots of them and they make all sorts of claims – weight loss, belly fat, improved energy....
Whole Grains and Belly Fat
For the last few weeks I've been writing about the effects of the Mediterranean Diet in general and some of the specific components of the Mediterranean Diet on abdominal fat deposition (read: belly fat). My patients are often concerned about belly fat, not because of its effects on their health, but because they don't like the way it looks. The truth is that abdominal fat is a good indicator of greater risks to your health.
Get the latest health and diet news - along with what you can do about it - sent to your Inbox once a week. Get Dr. Gourmet's Health and Nutrition Bites sent to you via email. Sign up now!
In last week's Dr. Tim Says.... column I wrote about the effects of a Mediterranean-style diet on central adiposity - otherwise known as "belly fat." I recently ran across a study conducted in Spain that compares three different diets head-to-head on their effects on the distribution of belly fat, so I thought I'd share it with you (Diabetes Care 2007;30(7): 1717-1723).
The Spanish researchers recruited their volunteers from the children of their obese, type 2 diabetic patients. Eleven people qualified for the study, in that their Body Mass Index was over 25 (clinically overweight or obese), with a waist circumference of 102 cm or less in men and 88cm or less in women, and not on medications that might affect fat metabolism. Notably, all of the participants had an insulin sensitivity score that indicated that they were insulin resistant - a risk factor for developing type 2 diabetes.
At the start of the study the participants' percentage of body fat vs. lean body mass was measured using standard equipment, then their entire body was scanned to measure their body fat distribution (chest and abdomen vs. hip, thigh and leg).
The participants were then randomly assigned to one of three groups and underwent three dietary periods of 28 days each, meaning each participant followed each diet for 28 days, then switched to another for 28 days, then another. The diets in question were designed to maintain their existing body weight and were as follows:
A low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet consisting of 15% protein, 65% carbohydrates and 20% fat (made up of 6% saturated fat, 8% monounsaturated fats, and 6% polyunsaturated fats)
A high-fat, monounsaturated-fat rich diet consisting of 15% protein, 47% carbohydrates and 38% fat (which consisted of 9% saturated fat and 23% monounsaturated fats [75% of which was in the form of extra-virgin olive oil] and 6% polyunsaturated fats) (a Mediterranean-style diet)
A high-saturated-fat diet consisting of 15% protein, 47% carbohydrates and 38% fat (23% saturated fat, 9% monounsaturated fat, and 6% polyunsaturated fat.
At the end of each 28-day period the volunteers underwent a glucose challenge to measure their insulin sensitivity, and their bodies were again scanned to look at body fat distribution.
Over the course of the study the Body Mass Indices and waist circumferences did not change - as you might expect, since their diets were designed to maintain their current weight. However, the high-carbohydrate diet caused more fat to accumulate in the chest and abdomen ("belly fat") than the legs. In fact, compared to the other two diets, the amount of fat in the legs actually decreased on a high-carb diet.
On the other hand, when following the high-fat, monounsatured fat diet, the participants experienced better insulin sensitivity than during the high-carb or high-saturated-fat diets.
Finally, insulin secretion actually fell during the high-saturated-fat diet when compared to either the low-fat, high-carb diet or the Mediterranean-style diet. Poor insulin secretion is another risk factor for diabetes.
This is a very small study but is very well designed in that the three diets were designed to maintain the volunteer's current weight. If the diets had been designed to help them lose weight, we would not be able to tell if any of the outcomes were due to losing weight or the composition of the diets. The significant point here is that versus a low-fat, high-carb diet, a Mediterranean-style diet higher in good monounsaturated fats seems to help you reduce your belly fat while protecting you from diabetes.
First posted: May 11, 2011