|The BMI/Breast Cancer Paradox||6/27/18|
|Gestational Diabetes Linked to Sugar-Sweetened Sodas||06/20/18|
|Got IBD? A low-FODMAP diet may be for you||06/13/18|
|Fresh vs. frozen vegetables: which is more nutritious?||06/06/18|
|Can we reverse the effects of 'supersizing'?||05/30/18|
|Take-out vs. made-from-scratch: weighing and pricing the options||05/23/18|
|How NOT to do science: very low carbohydrate diets and Type 1 diabetes||05/16/18|
|Low energy density foods keep you satisfied (and may help you lose weight)||05/09/18|
|Fish also good for diabetics: confirming conventional wisdom||05/02/18|
|All Health and Nutrition Bites|
Belly fat and sodas
Belly fat fixes seem to be ubiquitous: "Flatten your stomach with this one weird trick!" "Lose 10 pounds of belly fat by doing this!" The problem is that there's belly fat... and then there's belly fat. What most people don't realize is that there are two types of belly fat - and one is far worse for you than the other.
Mediterranean Diet Helps Prevent Central Fat Distribution
In last week's Dr. Tim Says.... column I wrote about the effects of a Mediterranean-style diet on central adiposity - otherwise known as "belly fat." I recently ran across a study conducted in Spain that compares three different diets head-to-head on their effects on the distribution of belly fat, so I thought I'd share it with you (Diabetes Care 2007(30): 1717-1723).
How to Lose Belly Fat
With the paperback version of my book coming out July 12 of 2012 (Just Tell Me What to Eat! The Delicious Six-Week Weight Loss Plan for the Real World), I've been reflecting on the myriad diets out there. There are lots of them and they make all sorts of claims – weight loss, belly fat, improved energy....
Get the latest health and diet news - along with what you can do about it - sent to your Inbox once a week. Get Dr. Gourmet's Health and Nutrition Bites sent to you via email. Sign up now!
For the last few weeks I've been writing about the effects of the Mediterranean Diet in general and some of the specific components of the Mediterranean Diet on abdominal fat deposition (read: belly fat). My patients are often concerned about belly fat, not because of its effects on their health, but because they don't like the way it looks. The truth is that abdominal fat is a good indicator of greater risks to your health.
This is why Waist to Hip Ratio is becoming the more favored method of estimating body fat, better than Body Mass Index. Body Mass Index only looks at weight in relation to height, which is a good indicator of overweight and obesity for most people, but it is limited by being unreliable for children, the elderly, people under 5 feet tall, and those who are very muscular. Waist to Hip Ratio, on the other hand, tells us physicians far more about where your body fat is deposited, which we are finding is far more of an indicator of increased health risks and is relevant for everyone.
There are two general types of abdominal fat: Visceral Abdominal Tissue (VAT), which is the fat that collects around the internal organs, and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT), which is the fat that collects under the skin. While higher levels of both types of abdominal fat are indicators of associated health risks such as diabetes, emerging research is indicating that Visceral Adipose Tissue is more of a health concern than Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue.
Last week I wrote about the Mediterranean Diet's effects on where abdominal fat is deposited: VAT or SAT. This week we're looking at a study on one element of the Mediterranean Diet: whole grains.
Using data collected in connection with the Framingham Heart Study, a long-term, large scale study of heart health among three generations of participants, researchers with funding from the USDA and General Mills looked at the relationship between whole grain consumption and the location of abdominal fat (Am J Clin Nutr 2010;92(5):1165-71). As part of the larger study, 2,834 men and women underwent CAT scans which allowed the researchers to determine the amount and location of their abdominal fat. The study also included waist and hip measurements, height and weight, collection of demographic information such as exercise and smoking status, and included a detailed food-frequency questionnaire which included multiple types of whole-grain foods and refined-grain foods.
The researchers grouped the participants into five increasing levels of whole grain intake as well as five increasing levels of refined grain intake. The amount and location of their abdominal fat was then correlated with both their whole grain and refined grain intake.
They found that generally speaking, the more whole grains a person ate, the smaller their waist was. Further, the highest level of whole grain intake meant the lowest levels of both Visceral Abdominal Tissue and Subcutaneous Abdominal Tissue. When the researchers looked at those who had the highest whole grain intake and also factored in the amount of refined grains that group ate, they found that even those with the highest whole grain intake had more Visceral Abdominal Tissue when they ate more refined grains, compared to those who ate the least.
In short, it appears that eating more whole grains does not necessarily offset the effect of also eating more refined grains. The report includes a list of the most commonly eaten whole grain foods among the participants, and you can take this as a simple guide to easy whole grain choices: dark bread, whole grain ready-to-eat breakfast cereals, oatmeal, popcorn, and brown rice. These are really easy changes to make in your diet, and you'll be healthier around the waist.
First posted: May 18, 2011