|Low-carb diets are good for your heart - or are they?||10/06/21|
|Just 7,000 steps||09/29/21|
|Healthier diet may protect from severe COVID-19||09/22/21|
|Salt substitutes may help prevent stroke and heart disease||09/15/21|
|The benefits of cycling for those with diabetes||09/08/21|
|Prevent the progression of heart disease with a Mediterranean diet||09/01/21|
|High blood pressure? Exercise can help||08/25/21|
|Update: the evidence for weight loss supplements||08/18/21|
|Junk is junk: seafood at chain restaurants||08/11/21|
|Prevent diabetes with fruits and vegetables||08/04/21|
|Is a vegetarian or vegan diet right for kids?||07/28/21|
|Red meat: yeah, we knew that||07/21/21|
|A dietary approach to reducing migraine||07/14/21|
|A healthier diet reduces the risk of pregnancy complications||07/07/21|
|All Health and Nutrition Bites|
Watch your waist, redux
For years physicians and researchers have used Body Mass Index as a simple and cheap measure to help estimate an individual's risk of such chronic diseases as diabetes, high blood pressure, and heart disease. It's not perfect, however.
Watch Your Waist - Not Just Your Weight
When we talk about obesity it seems like we're most often talking about Body Mass Index (BMI). Certainly I've been doing a lot of talking and writing about it. There's another tool that doctors use to assess weight that I've talked about, just not quite as much: Waist-to-Hip Ratio (WHR).
BMI, WHR, and your risk of diabetes
I've written previously about Body Mass Index and Waist to Hip ratio and their usefulness in assessing your overall health. There's been some controversy in medical circles, however, about whether Body Mass Index (BMI), Waist to Hip Ratio (WHR) or simple Waist Circumference (WC) is a better predictor of type 2 diabetes.
The step-by-step guide to a Mediterranean Diet
Dr. Tim Harlan's best tips and recipes in a six-week plan for you to learn how to follow a Mediterranean-style diet while still eating foods you know and love. Just $15.00 +s/h!
Get the latest health and diet news - along with what you can do about it - sent to your Inbox once a week. Get Dr. Gourmet's Health and Nutrition Bites sent to you via email. Sign up now!
Almost six years ago I shared with readers a study that found that even when people's Body Mass Index was within normal range, if their Waist to Hip ratio was over .90 (the World Health Organization defines this as centrally obese) they were more likely to die of any cause than those whose Body Mass Index and Waist to Hip Ratio were within clinically normal parameters.
That study is just one indication that how much body fat someone is carrying, as well as where that fat is located on their body, may be a greater indicator of metabolic risk than Body Mass Index alone.
Today's research, published in the journal Nutrition (2021;85:111134) looks more closely at both body fat and specific health risks.
This study was carried out in Brazil among nearly 800 men and women who were born in Sao Paolo, Brazil in 1978 and 1979. At birth their birth weight was recorded as well as information regarding their parents. Over 20 years later the participants were between 23 and 25 years of age and underwent height, weight, and waist measurements as well as skinfold measurements to assess body fat. Blood was drawn for insulin and cholesterol tests and the participants responded to dietary and lifestyle questionnaires.
Over ten years later the participants were between 37 and 39, and while they again were weighed and measured and surveyed and provided blood for testing, this time they underwent a body scan known as air pletysmography that allows much greater accuracy in the measurement of body fat percentage. Another test, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, provided measurements of muscle mass and total body weight.
The authors classified the participants into one of three groups:
HWI (Healthy Weight): those with a BMI in the clinically normal range with a body fat measurement (via skinfold) below the 90th percentile;
NWO (Normal Weight Obesity): those with a BMI in the clinically normal range with a body fat measurement (via skinfold) above the 90th percentile; and
OWO (Overweight/Obesity): Body Mass Index over 25 as well as a body fat measurement above the 90th percentile
For those 23-to-25-year-olds the authors also analyzed their clinical scores to determine if they had Metabolic Syndrome, a collection of metabolic abnormalities that indicates a greater risk of cardiovascular and other metabolic diseases. These abnormalities include:
Waist Circumference 90 or more centimeters for men and 80 or more centimeters for women;
Triglyceride scores over 150;
HDL cholesterol scores over 40 for men or 50 for women;
High blood pressures of either >130 systolic or >85 diastolic;
Fasting blood glucose equal to or greater than 100.
In all cases, if the participants were being treated with medications for cholesterol, high blood pressure, or insulin-controlling medications, the authors took that as proof that the participant met the criteria for the abnormality.
The same information from the participants at ages 37-39 was gathered and the same analysis was performed - and those who were considered to have Metabolic Syndrome at in their 20's were excluded from the final analysis.
The researchers compared the Metabolic Syndrome status of the participants in their 30's with their classification by body composition groups (HWI, NWO, and OWO).
The authors state that after taking into account demographic, dietary, and lifestyle variables, "We did not find differences in the [relative risk] for [Metabolic Syndrome] between [Normal Weight Obesity] and [Overweight/Obesity]."
What I found interesting about their results is that while those with Overweight/Obesity were 161% more likely to develop Metabolic Syndrome than those with clinically normal weight status, those with Normal Weight Obesity - excessive body fat percentage - were 187% more likely to develop Metabolic Syndrome.
This pattern of slightly (but perhaps not statistically significant) greater risk for those with NWO than OWO holds true for the risk of excessive waist circumference, cholesterol scores, and blood glucose levels. Those with Overweight/Obesity were 172% more likely to have high blood pressure compared to those of clinically normal weight, while those with Normal Weight Obesity were 144% more likely to have high blood pressure.
This suggests to me that excess body fat - and not just total weight - could be more dangerous to your health than a number on a scale. Certainly this aligns with previous research showing that BMI is inaccurate for those with low body fat, as well as research showing the risks of a higher Waist to Hip ratio. Here's how to calculate your Waist to Hip ratio.
First posted: June 16, 2021