|The BMI/Breast Cancer Paradox||6/27/18|
|Gestational Diabetes Linked to Sugar-Sweetened Sodas||06/20/18|
|Got IBD? A low-FODMAP diet may be for you||06/13/18|
|Fresh vs. frozen vegetables: which is more nutritious?||06/06/18|
|Can we reverse the effects of 'supersizing'?||05/30/18|
|Take-out vs. made-from-scratch: weighing and pricing the options||05/23/18|
|How NOT to do science: very low carbohydrate diets and Type 1 diabetes||05/16/18|
|Low energy density foods keep you satisfied (and may help you lose weight)||05/09/18|
|Fish also good for diabetics: confirming conventional wisdom||05/02/18|
|All Health and Nutrition Bites|
New Research Affirms Individualized Vitamin D Supplementation for Pregnant Women
While we know that Vitamin D levels which simply prevent rickets are not adequate to provide optimal health, we are continuing to explore exactly how much vitamin D supplementation is beneficial. There is controversy among scientists over this issue. Some researchers and professional groups now recommend 75 nmol/L and perhaps higher. (Am J Clin Nutr 2006;84:18 –28)
Best way to get your vitamins?
Certainly there are times when it's a good idea to take extra vitamins or other supplements, but these are limited to people in pretty specific populations: for example, during pregnancy, if you are a woman of childbearing age, or if you are following a vegan diet. However, in our well-fed Western culture it's pretty rare to really need to take vitamins.
Eat your antioxidants
People often rely on vitamin supplements to make up for their poor diets. This is especially true now that we know that some vitamins, such as antioxidants (vitamins E, C, or beta-carotene) or B vitamins, have been shown in the lab to help prevent such conditions as cancer, heart disease, and high cholesterol. But are the supplements actually having the same impact as a diet that contains more vitamins through diet alone?
Get the latest health and diet news - along with what you can do about it - sent to your Inbox once a week. Get Dr. Gourmet's Health and Nutrition Bites sent to you via email. Sign up now!
In my practice we ask our patients to bring all of the medications they are taking, including vitamins and herbs or supplements, to every office visit. This is so that if a patient is seeing more than one doctor - maybe a cardiologist in addition to visiting me, an internist - we can make sure that none of the medications they are taking will interact with each other in negative ways. (Coumadin (warfarin) users should be especially careful to do this, as many medications, vitamins, or supplements will intact with the warfarin, sometimes with serious consequences.) I discourage my patients from taking most vitamins, as the research is fairly clear that for those who are not nutrient deficient or need supplementation for some other reason (like being vegan or pregnant), getting your vitamins from foods and not pills is better for you. (Here's more discussion and citations.)
That said, in research it is important that a study not only be well-designed, its results must also be verifiable by others performing a similar trial and getting similar results. This is why in looking at how strong the evidence is for one thing or another, we do what is known as a "review." A review of all of the relevant, well-performed studies performed on a particular topic helps us see whether certain results or conclusions are consistent: if they are not, then we can't say that something is "proven."
Recently a team of researchers reviewed the current state of the evidence regarding vitamin and mineral supplements, choosing to focus on their effect, if any, on the risk of heart disease or cancer (Ann Intern Med 2013;159(12):824-834). In choosing the relevant trials, they limited themselves to those studies published between 2005 and early 2013, looking at the following vitamins and minerals (or combinations thereof): A, B1, B2, B6, B12, C, D, E, calcium, iron, zinc, magnesium, niacin, folic acid, beta-carotene, and selenium. After identifying all of the possible articles, the further limited themselves to those studies that were considered of "good" or "fair" quality as defined by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Finally, all of the included studies were on people who were had no known nutrient deficiencies, leaving the researchers with a total of 26 studies.
The findings of all of the included studies were not only mixed, but often contradictory. For example, two studies of multivitamins (a combination of three or more vitamins and minerals) found lower cancer incidence in men of nearly clinical significance, but in another study that also included women, no such effect was found. The original investigators of the first two studies speculated that this effect was because men generally have lower antioxidant levels than women.
When the researchers assessed the studies for any harm done by taking the vitamins or minerals, they found similar, mixed if not outright contradictory, results. One interesting exception was taking beta-carotene: it appeared to increase the risk of lung cancer in those already at higher risk for lung cancer, such as smokers or those who work with asbestos. Another firm result was that taking vitamin E consistently showed no effect on the risk of heart disease or cancer.
Don't bother taking vitamin E and definitely avoid taking beta-carotene if you smoke. And even those conclusions could change in light of further research. Right now we don't have good evidence supporting taking vitamins unless your doctor has told you to, so why waste your money? Better to spend that money on great quality food - it's much more tasty than taking pills and we know it's more effective.
First posted: November 13, 2013