|The 5:2 diet - intermittent fasting - debunked||12/05/18|
|Drinking coffee may reduce all-cause mortality||11/28/18|
|When the low-carb hype doesn't add up||11/21/18|
|Vitamin D supplements don't prevent cancer or heart disease||11/14/18|
|Breakfast may not be as important as previously thought||11/07/18|
|Legumes may help prevent diabetes||10/31/18|
|More organic foods may mean less cancer, but the evidence isn't in||10/24/18|
|Corn oil better for cholesterol than coconut oil||10/17/18|
|The right fats help reduce age-related weight gain||10/10/18|
|Red meat in a Mediterranean-style Diet||10/03/18|
|Portion size and consumption, healthy foods edition||09/26/18|
|'Resistant starch' does not improve glycemic control||09/19/18|
|Live more robustly in later life with a Mediterranean Diet||09/12/18|
|Beverages vs. food: the source of sugar matters||09/05/18|
|All Health and Nutrition Bites|
Small Changes Can Have a Big Impact
You probably are aware that being overweight has a negative impact on your blood pressure, and that high blood pressure can lead to stroke and heart attack and even death. Losing weight is the obvious answer, but how much weight do you have to lose to make a difference in your heart health?
Why Can't You Lose Weight?
The question is, when it comes to weight loss programs, what helps a person be successful in losing weight and keeping it off? Researchers at the University of Pittsburgh Obesity/Nutrition Research Center tried to find out by sending questionnaires to 110 people who had contacted their center to sign up for weight loss treatment.
More evidence that healthier isn't more expensive
People still believe that eating healthier costs more than eating the processed foods available in the supermarket or even buying fast food. The problem, however, is how "cost" and "healthier" is defined: is it cost per calorie?
Get the latest health and diet news - along with what you can do about it - sent to your Inbox once a week. Get Dr. Gourmet's Health and Nutrition Bites sent to you via email. Sign up now!
If you're reading this, it's unlikely that you don't know about the obesity crisis. The most recent estimates are that over one-third of U.S. adults are obese (having a Body Mass Index over 30). You might think it's a simple problem with a simple solution: weigh too much? Lose weight. Yet anyone who's tried to lose a significant amount of weight can tell you that it's not nearly so simple. Worse, we now know that the vast majority of people who do manage to lose a significant amount of weight will gain it back.
Just last week I was involved in a discussion of large-scale strategies to address the problem with overweight and obesity in this country, and as is usually the case, the discussion largely focused on weight loss, with positive outcomes being measured in pounds lost. My approach, as you may be aware if you've followed Dr. Gourmet or The Goldring Center for Culinary Medicine, is a little different: I focus on improving what people eat. My positive outcomes include "How many pieces of fruit did you eat today?" and "How many servings of legumes did you eat this week?"
I've long advocated incremental dietary change rather than trying to completely change your diet all at once. In May of this year, an article in Obesity looked at the effects of making these small dietary changes as a means of long-term weight loss (2017;25(5):833-841).
The authors recruited over 400 overweight or obese Black and Hispanic men and women to participate in a 12-month weight-loss trial. Each participant was encouraged to select one of ten small change eating strategies to address a specific dietary challenge they faced. The ten possible changes included such strategies as "drink water instead of sweetened beverages," "make half the main meal vegetables," and "eat a fruit or vegetable before snacking." The participants also set personal physical activity goals such as "walk at least 20 minutes daily" and signed a behavior contract to stick to their goals for at least 6 days of every week.
The purpose of the research was to assess whether teaching participants ways to feel more positive in general and to use self-affirmations when faced with barriers to their new goals would help the participants increase their feelings of self-efficacy, which would help them stick to their goals and result in weight loss.
Unfortunately, those positive affect/self-affirmation (PA/SA) strategies made no difference in how much weight participants lost, although those participants who experienced more stress from work or family issues who were taught the PA/SA strategies were less likely to gain weight in response to those life stressors. In their discussion, the authors note (with some disappointment) that only 9% of all participants lost at least 7% of their body weight and suggest that a more intensive PA/SA intervention may work better in helping "high-risk racial and ethnic minority populations" to make behavioral changes leading to weight loss.
Granted, the authors were performing a weight-loss trial, not a behavioral change trial, but the focus on weight loss to the exclusion of other changes that can have serious effect on health is short-sighted. Sure, less than 10% of all participants lost at least 7% of their body weight, but the authors state that "63% of participants lost weight overall" - and on average they lost 2.4% of their body weight. That's not nothing - and even more importantly, 68% of all participants reported sticking to their chosen small change eating strategy and 36% stuck to their physical activity goals. They may not have lost a significant amount of weight, but making small changes for the long term, such as increasing your Mediterranean Diet score by two points (say, snacking on nuts instead of Doritos and switching from white rice and pastas to brown rice and whole wheat pasta) still reduces your risk of all-cause mortality by 25%. And that's not nothing either.
First posted: December 13, 2017