|When questionable research still proves something||12/04/19|
|High blood pressure? Exercise!||11/20/19|
|The risks of cutting too many calories||11/13/19|
|Just 4 healthy lifestyle factors make a big difference||11/06/19|
|Sugar-sweetened beverage sales ban contributes to lower intake||10/30/19|
|Put down the media at meal times||10/23/19|
|Better research on the impact of smaller plates||10/16/19|
|The strongest evidence yet: plant-based diets prevent diabetes||10/09/19|
|Gain less weight by snacking on nuts||10/02/19|
|Reduce PMS symptoms with whole grains||09/25/19|
|Just one soft drink per day increases your risk of death||09/18/19|
|All Health and Nutrition Bites|
Breakfast: Correlation is Not Causality
A common pitfall in interpreting research is mistaking a relationship between two facts (correlation) with one of the facts directly causing the other (causality). A good illustration of mistaking correlation with causality is as follows: "It's hot during the summer. There are more murders during the summer. Hot weather causes murders."
Getting the balance right
We've seen in previous studies that eating red meat has been linked to breast cancer in women as well as colon or rectal cancer. Researchers at the University of North Carolina noted these results as well as those studies that link eating more fruits and vegetables with a reduced risk of these cancers.
More Functional Food News
Recently I wrote about a cookie containing plant sterols that effectively improved cholesterol profiles in healthy, overweight volunteers. Researchers at the University of California at Davis recently reported the findings of a similar study they performed on the effectiveness of a plant-sterol-fortified orange drink (Am J Clin Nutr 2006;84(4):756-61).
Get the latest health and diet news - along with what you can do about it - sent to your Inbox once a week. Get Dr. Gourmet's Health and Nutrition Bites sent to you via email. Sign up now!
If you've been reading our Health & Nutrition Bites for a while, you probably know that the fiber content of a food contributes to your feeling more satisfied after you eat it. It also helps prevent heart disease, improves your cholesterol scores, and may even help you gain less weight as you get older.
Fiber is important for diabetics, as well, as higher fiber intake has been associated with a lower fasting insulin score. Like whole grains such as brown rice and whole wheat bread, legumes are an excellent source of fiber - but they're also a good source of protein and other nutrients. A team at University of California at Davis (Appetite 2017;118:75-81) wondered if a meal containing beans would be more satisfying, both subjectively and in terms of digestive hormones, than a meal containing a non-legume protein. Essentially: was one source of fiber better than another?
In their pilot study the authors recruited 6 men and 6 women, all overweight or clinically obese, to participate in their feeding study. Once per week for three weeks the participants came to the lab and ate one of three different breakfasts, which were served to them in random order. Each breakfast contained the same amount of fiber, but the main source of the fiber was different: the control breakfast used a couscous-based pasta, while a second breakfast contained black beans along with the couscous-based pasta, and a third included the couscous-based pasta and was supplemented with a non-legume-based fiber. All three breakfasts also contained the same amount of protein.
The participants responded to appetite and mood questionnaires before and after the meal as well as every hour after the meal for 5 hours. Blood was drawn every hour as well so that the researchers could track appetite hormones as well as glucose and insulin levels. After leaving the lab the participants kept detailed records of everything else they ate that day and turned those records in to the lab.
The results are rather surprising. Regardless of which meal they consumed, the participants ate about the same amount after leaving the lab: the authors had expected that consuming the bean-containing meal would mean they ate later in the day than when they consumed either the control meal or the added fiber meal. Similarly, although the bean meal caused greater digestive hormone response than the other two meals, the participants did not feel more satisfied - the added fiber meal had the greatest effect on the participants' feelings of how much they thought they would eat at the next meal. Blood glucose levels were also about the same for all three meals. That said, the bean meal caused a much lower insulin response than the control meal or the added fiber meal: about 50% lower.
This is important for those who might be pre-diabetic: not all sources of fiber are equal. Clearly fiber from beans is superior to other fiber sources when you're concerned with your insulin levels. And far tastier! Here are some legume-containing recipes for you to add to your high-fiber repertoire:
Elizabeth J. Reverri, Jody M.Randolph, C. Tissa Kappagoda,EunyoungPark, Indika Edirisinghe, Britt M.Burton-Freeman. Assessing beans as a source of intrinsic fiber on satiety in men and women with metabolic syndrome. Appetite 2017 (118:75-81)
First posted: November 8, 2017