|When is the best time to exercise?||01/18/23|
|Too much coffee might be bad - for some||01/11/23|
|Lower risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes with a Mediterranean diet||12/28/22|
|Stay sharp with flavonols||12/14/22|
|Salting at the table||12/07/22|
|On time - and Velveeta||11/30/22|
|Cut calories vs. cut protein intake: the results will surprise you||11/16/22|
|Mediterranean Diet Improves Symptoms of Depression in Young Men||11/09/22|
|Weight and vision||10/26/22|
|When you eat might matter more than previously thought||10/19/22|
|All Health and Nutrition Bites|
Fruit Availability Increases Consumption Beyond the Individual
Eating more fruits and vegetables is an integral part of The Mediterranean Diet, and the effects of more fruits and vegetables in the diet range from reduced risk of heart disease and stroke, to protection from benign prostatic hyperplasia and diabetes.
Does Walkability Equal Walking?
Is your neighborhood walkable? As part of the overall effort to address high levels of overweight and obesity along with low levels of exercise, researchers are looking not only at barriers to eating healthy, but also at barriers to exercise. Walking is one of the easiest and cheapest exercises to perform, but some neighborhoods are more conducive to walking than others.
More Availability Does Not Necessarily Increase Consumption
There's been a lot of talk about "food deserts" - those areas, often in low-income neighborhoods, that are marked by a distinct lack of access to fresh foods. Larger grocery stores that offer fresh produce and meats are few and often only accessed by long trips via public transportation. Instead, the produce and fresh foods that are available are overpriced and found in tiny neighborhood markets that don't have the buying power for better prices or the turnover to keep those foods fresh and available.
Get the latest health and diet news - along with what you can do about it - sent to your Inbox once a week. Get Dr. Gourmet's Health and Nutrition Bites sent to you via email. Sign up now!
Back in 2011 I shared with you a study that looked at two things: how often people ate fast food when compared to the number of fast food joints within a specific number of miles, and people's overall diet quality when compared to the number of supermarkets and grocery stores within the same area.
This study hoped to link poor dietary quality with the low availability of fresh food (i.e., "food deserts") as well as linking greater availability of fast food with a poorer diet (some call areas with greater numbers of fast food joints "food swamps"). Somewhat surprisingly, neither theory was proved true.
In an article in Appetite (2015;92:227-232), a team at the University of South Carolina noted that people's perceptions of what is convenient to them in their neighborhood may be very different from something's actual, map-measured distance from their home. Could this be the reason previous studies found little association?
To find out, the researchers polled over 800 adult men and women living in 8 counties in South Carolina. These counties were chosen because the locations of commercial food outlets had previously been established. The participants were asked to think about the area within a 20-minute walk from their home (about 1 mile) and to express how strongly they agreed with the statement "There are many opportunities to purchase fast foods in my neighborhood such as McDonald's, Taco Bell, KFC and take-out pizza places, etc.."
The authors then asked how often the respondents typically ate from such a fast food place, whether eat-in or take-out. The responses were compared both to the individual's perception of how many fast food places there were in their neighborhood as well as the actual, map-based numbers of such places.
The results are really quite interesting. Two-thirds of the respondents were overweight or obese, and most of those who had at least one fast food restaurant in their neighborhood were white and had a college education. Those who believed that fast food restaurants were more available in their neighborhood were indeed more likely to consume fast food, but the association was not statistically significant. Similarly, when looking at the location of fast food restaurants on a map, having a fast food restaurant in the individual's neighborhood meant they were slightly less likely to consume fast food on a weekly basis.
This study adds weight to the idea that there is a difference between the absolute number and location of fast food restaurants and people's perceptions of how convenient they are - which makes it very difficult to blame obesity simply on the number and location of fast food restaurants. What this study did not address was the location and availability of fresh ingredients - the other side of the food availability coin.
First posted: October 7, 2015