|Take-out vs. made-from-scratch: weighing and pricing the options||05/23/18|
|How NOT to do science: very low carbohydrate diets and Type 1 diabetes||05/16/18|
|Low energy density foods keep you satisfied (and may help you lose weight)||05/09/18|
|Fish also good for diabetics: confirming conventional wisdom||05/02/18|
|Putting calories and sodium information on restaurant menus may backfire||04/25/18|
|The next step in the fight against heart disease: teaching medical students how to cook||04/18/18|
|Omega-3 supplements may not guard against heart attack||04/11/18|
|Pasta still won't make you gain weight||04/04/18|
|Testing resveratrol and curcumin as anti-inflammatories||03/28/18|
|Should you consume additional protein to help maintain muscle mass?||03/21/18|
|It's the quality of the carbohydrates that counts||03/14/18|
|B vitamin supplements linked to lung cancer||03/07/18|
|Genetically-based weight loss plans||02/28/18|
|Eating more highly processed foods linked to greater risk of cancer||02/21/18|
|Can you be fit and fat?||02/14/18|
|'Burning hot' tea linked to esophageal cancer||02/07/18|
|All Health and Nutrition Bites|
Mediterranean Diet vs. American Heart Association Diet
A group of researchers in Spain compared a Mediterranean style diet to a low-fat American Heart Association (AHA) type diet, showing a significant reduction in blood pressure, cholesterol, fasting blood sugar and other markers of inflammation associated with heart disease.
Fruits' fiber for life
The Mediterranean Diet is considered a pattern of eating with nine components: vegetables, legumes, fruits and nuts, cereals (whole grains), fish, olive oil, dairy products, meats, and alcohol. Last week we discussed a study that suggests that it's the overall pattern - not one specific component - that contributes to reduced cellular aging. Nevertheless, research continues into the effects of the specific components in an effort to understand how those individual nine points contribute to the diet as a whole.
Prevent Diabetes without Losing Weight
When the media discuss diabetes prevention, there's often a primary focus on weight loss. While it's true that those with excess body weight are at a demonstrably greater risk of developing diabetes, it's ruinously shortsighted to assume that weight loss alone will solve the problem: excess body weight is not the only risk factor.
Get the latest health and diet news - along with what you can do about it - sent to your Inbox once a week. Get Dr. Gourmet's Health and Nutrition Bites sent to you via email. Sign up now!
Last week's review article was a look at the state of the research into dietary sodium and its association with blood pressure, heart disease and death from all causes. As the authors noted, most of the research on salt in the diet are observational studies: they can show association, but not causality. That said, some observational studies can be more convincing than others.
An ongoing study in Spain, known as PREDIMED, has been evaluating the effects of three diets on various health parameters: a Mediterranean-style diet supplemented with extra-virgin olive oil, a Mediterranean-style diet supplemented with nuts, and a low-fat diet. On an annual basis the nearly 7,500 Spaniards at high risk for cardiovascular disease completed a food-frequency questionnaire with the assistance of a dietitian and responded to a questionnaire about such lifestyle variables as physical activity, education, and medications. Their blood pressures, height, weight, and waist circumference were also measured.
With the information gathered in the dietary questionnaires, the authors were able to estimate the amount of sodium in each participant's diet and classify them into 4 increasing levels of sodium intake, ranging from less than 1,500mg of sodium per day to over 3,400mg/day (Am J Clin Nutr 2015;101:440-8). With the multiple years of data, they were also able to see which participants increased their sodium intake to over 2,300mg/day as well as those who decreased their intake to below that point.
After controlling for a truly impressive number of variables, including Body Mass Index; age; smoking status: which diet they were assigned to; family medical history; caloric intake (as well as whether that intake increased or decreased); and amounts of dietary fats, fiber, calcium, potassium, and omega-3 fatty acids; the researchers could compare the sodium intake of those who experienced heart attack, stroke, or death with those who did not.
The results are quite interesting: those who increased their sodium intake after the first yearly questionnaire were 72% more likely to experience a heart attack or stroke - and were twice as likely to die from them, while those who decreased it were 48% less likely to die from any cause.
The study authors note that using questionnaires to estimate sodium intake is not the most accurate way to measure the amount of salt in a person's diet. Nor can an observational study like this prove that one thing causes another, even though the authors took into account quite a number of variables. Even so, this adds yet more indirect evidence that those at higher risk of heart disease, like the participants in this study, would do well to keep their salt intake under 2,300 milligrams per day - the current Institute of Medicine recommendation.
First posted: March 25, 2015