|When questionable research still proves something||12/04/19|
|High blood pressure? Exercise!||11/20/19|
|The risks of cutting too many calories||11/13/19|
|Just 4 healthy lifestyle factors make a big difference||11/06/19|
|Sugar-sweetened beverage sales ban contributes to lower intake||10/30/19|
|Put down the media at meal times||10/23/19|
|Better research on the impact of smaller plates||10/16/19|
|The strongest evidence yet: plant-based diets prevent diabetes||10/09/19|
|Gain less weight by snacking on nuts||10/02/19|
|Reduce PMS symptoms with whole grains||09/25/19|
|Just one soft drink per day increases your risk of death||09/18/19|
|All Health and Nutrition Bites|
Drinking milk may be bad for your bones
For years, if not decades, we have been told to drink our milk in order to build strong bones. Milk is a good source of calcium, Vitamin D, and phosphorus, all important nutrients for bone formation and maintenance, so many people are told that they should drink at least three glasses a day to help prevent fractures and osteoporosis.
Fruits and vegetables are good for your... bones?
In light of the health risks presented by osteoporosis, researchers in Cambridge, England sought to determine whether fruits and veggies could help prevent bone loss (Am J Clin Nutr 2006;83(6):1420-8). They recruited 5 groups of people to participate in their study: adolescent boys and girls, young women between 23 and 37, and older men and women between 60 and 83.
Leaner Body, Stronger Bones
Osteoporosis is a big concern for postmenopausal women. Menopause is marked by a significant decrease in estrogen production, and remaining estrogen levels are direct indicators of bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. This is just one of the reasons that so many women were encouraged to start hormone replacement therapy at menopause - to help prevent osteoporosis.
Get the latest health and diet news - along with what you can do about it - sent to your Inbox once a week. Get Dr. Gourmet's Health and Nutrition Bites sent to you via email. Sign up now!
About a year ago a friend of mine started jogging. Like me, she was a bicyclist, but she was looking to change up her exercise routine. While bicycling gives you plenty of leg muscle, however, it doesn't get your shinbones used to the pounding that they take in running. After just a few weeks of vigorous workouts she found herself with ankle pain that just wouldn't go away, so she went to the doctor and found out that she'd developed an incipient stress fracture in her ankle. Fortunately the treatment for this is simply rest, but the doctor she saw told her to take vitamin D supplements "to help strengthen her bones." This made sense to me, as back in 2009 I recalled reporting on a study that showed that those taking vitamin D were as much as 20% less likely to break a bone than those who did not.
Since that study, however, meta-analyses of multiple smaller studies have shown mixed results with respect to Vitamin D's effects on actual bone mineral density and not just the risk of fracture.
With that in mind, researchers in New Zealand devised a meta-analysis designed to see if vitamin D alone - not in combination with calcium - would affect bone mineral density (Lancet 2014;383(9912):146-55). They limited the selected studies to those that measured bone density in at least one (and as many as six) different locations; where participants' baseline vitamin D levels were low enough that taking a supplement would have a measurable effect; and the study had to administer a high enough dose of vitamin D, without calcium, to affect the bones.
Twenty-three studies including over 4,000 people, over 90% of whom were female, were included in the meta-analysis. In addition to the criteria above, none of the participants had conditions that might affect their bone mineral density, such as pregnancy, corticosteroid use, or kidney problems.
Briefly, they found that those studies showing positive effects were more likely to be due to random chance rather than taking Vitamin D. Other studies showed bone mineral density decreasing, while yet others showed no effects at all. In short, they concluded, "the use of vitamin D supplements for skeletal protection in adults without specific risk factors for vitamin D deficiency is not justified."
Unless you are told that you have a vitamin D deficiency, taking vitamin D supplements is unnecessary. The sun is our biggest source of vitamin D, but with more attention being paid to the risk of skin cancer, I've actually heard people express concern that they weren't getting enough Vitamin D because they wore sunscreen on a daily basis. Don't worry about it - between 5 and 30 minutes of sun exposure twice a week on your arms, legs, face or back, without sunscreen, is thought to be enough, so you may well get all the vitamin D you need walking to your car or the bus stop. Further, many foods are fortified with vitamin D, including orange juice, milk, and many commercial cereals. Fatty fish such as mackerel or salmon are also good sources of vitamin D.
First posted: January 15, 2014